Dec 22, 2016  Good looking model and decent photos, too. The iPhone 6+ I have takes excellent photos, too. I've used it more than once taking a picture of something before I take it apart so I can remember two months later where all the parts go,once I get back to finishing it up.

• Just Tried Rpp For Macbook
• Just Tried App For Mac

Just Tried Rpp For Macbook

Andrey, I'm noticing severe halos when using the local contrast feature, even in smaller amounts below 20, on objects with even moderately contrasting backgrounds, very significant. One needs to be able to be fine tune it in order for it to be useful Also, the brightness slider seems to get hung up every so often. When it happens I can move it but it has no effect on the image. Is it a mode that turns it off? Can't figure that out, seems like a bug.

Closing and re-opening seems to make it stop. Also, I find that RPP works better with some images and not as well with others. I spose every processor has this issue, they are all different. I've had several images where i couldn't get any joy from ACR, and where, when opened in RPP, the joy was happening. Maybe it's me though.the 'me' factor is firmly implanted in myself and to know this, you have to be me.

I just tried to place an order for the TurboTax Deluxe (Mac) 2016 (the download version). Somehow the quantity got set to 3 but I only need 1. Download Final Cut Pro for macOS 10.13.6 or later and enjoy it on your Mac. Try FCPX and see for yourself that it is far, far from “iMovie for prosumers”. Acer al1706 drivers for mac. It’s a great program for prosumers who want more than iMovie can offer, no doubt, but it’s also a superb tool for pros. Just ask the many that rely on it daily to edit television.

That's a mess. I have a few images that were shot on a grey day with backlighting that RPP seems to have problems with, also, a few shot on sunny days with large areas of heavy shadow contrast against yellow.has rendering yellow been an issue for you? It seems to give me problems. The extreme ends of the histogram are hard to pick up when one should see a 'tail' that represents very small% areas like specular highlights or small%'s of very dark areas. It would be nice to be able read this type of detail at the ends of the histogram. I would prefer a more contrasty representation.

Just Tried App For Mac

UI wise, it would great if the app was dual monitor friendly so we could drag and resize to make the tool bar reside on the right hand monitor. It would also be cool if one could work on images against a black background, while being isolated from the tool panel. My crunchy eyes have a very hard time working with white light flashing in my eyes.

'Save As' would be good too. After spending more time with RPP, I just can't get over the speed issues. I need the immediacy or real time editing. I think the market, at this point, demands it.WYDIWYS,I (what you do is what you see, immediately). I don't mean to be overly redundant on that point but it's a huge thing. I know that you already know this.

I'm still messing with things here because I really like certain things about the overall rendering.I'm a bit bummed about the local contrast issue, it really limits when you can apply that feature. Hope all that helps. I think I know what you talking about. Halo itself is part of the method, but it may became very visible when background is very dark and even slight increase in contrast push values to total 0 and we have flat black halos all around. In this case try to lift black point a little - some negative value.

Try -1,-2,-3 and as soon as halo disappeared work your way back in smaller steps till it starts appearing again. You found that with BP -1 there is a halo and it's gone at -2 try -1.5 to see if it still helps. Basically you need to find the smallest value eliminating the halo. This applies only to black flat halos you see even at values below default 18. I tried pretty much every converter available on the market.

Practically all of them handle real time editing on scale from 'ok' to 'good'. The problem is that all of them sacrifice quality over user experience and have to stick to deeply theoretically and practically flawed quick and dirty approach in image processing just to please customers and make interface attractive. This doesn't mean efficiency - only ease of uneducated use, plain attractiveness and false sense of control over the image.

I don't mind - for 99% of all consumers this is enough, makes people happy and happy people are good people You may have really quick and nasty 'polaroid' picture (in camera jpeg). You may have affordable generic velvia developed and printed at Costco for few pennies (practically all Raw converters). You may have your own lab, pick your film depending on scene and do development and printing all by yourself (nothing, you are on your own, big guys are so not interested). Now guess where I place myself and RPP from those three.

Hi Andrey, I understand all that but there is something to be said for that immediacy. It's part of generating a creative flow when working. A lot of people feel this way. However, I am ignorant enough, from a programming perspective, to not realize what it takes to accomplish all these things within a piece of software that strives to be excellent. Maybe it isn't possible and, perhaps, you are suggesting that it isn't possible.i can totally understand that: ) I'll try to send some examples to you.